Friday, December 16, 2005

Syriana’s Message is Solid, but

the film’s pace left me wanting.

 

Yes, it stirs the pot on current political intrigue and reality in the Middle East and should be lauded for telling multiple truths.

 But as a film, it’s pace and editing left alot to be desired. I found I had to truly pay attention in order to follow the plot.  And it is not necessarily a bad thing to have a complex plot, but when viewers have to struggle to stay interested, to me, that is not a good thing.

The film tells three, interconnected stories, all centered on America’s role and interests in the Middle East oil trade and its resulting politics. Not a new story, but one told, finally,  in a very clear and direct way. And not unbiased in the least.

The story deserved better direction.

The director, Stephen Gaghan, should have kept a firmer pace, and the editing could have been tighter as well. The film is shot in stark contrasts, almost bordering on film noir, but lacks any moodiness or texture. It tells a good story, I just felt it could have been told better. (And it fact, it has been. If you like modern spy stories, I recommend you check out 2001’s Spy Games starring Brad Pitt and Robert Redford. Better pace, tighter editing and the characters’ motivations are clearer.)

Performances in Syriana are high caliber: George Clooney is very good in the ‘spy brought in from the cold’ main character role, but with so much of his emotional state internalized, that, I think, the director missed an opportunity to turn this into an outstanding performance. Matt Damon gives one of his best performances since his breakout role in Good Will Hunting in this film, but the writers could have given him more. Without giving away too much of the plot, there is a point at the end of this film when you begin to believe that Damon’s character might also have a dual role…but the storyline doesn’t give you enough to follow that line of thought, and I think the film would have been stronger if more of those suggestions had had follow through.

Jeffrey Wright is wonderful as an attorney walking the fine line between questionable ethics and outright fraud, with Chris Cooper giving a crusty performance as his blustery and shrewd client. And William Hurt and Christopher Plummer round out the cameo/supporting cast roles admirably.  Even Amanda Peet gives a short, tart turn as Damon’s wife.

And one of my current favorites, Alexander Siddig (late of TV’s Deep Space Nine, and one of the only reasons to rent the recently released DVD, Kingdom of Heaven), has a pivotal, and sympathetic Arab role in this film that he carries admirably – okay, full disclose time– I also think he’s stunning to watch on the big screen.

Three stars, mostly for the storyline and performances. I have to admit a tad of disappointment over the pace, direction and editing, since the buzz on this movie has been so strong. But I still recommend it; I just don’t think it is a must-see. Note that this movie is rated R for violence and language.  The violence is stark, real, and often, unexpected,  so be warned. Not a movie for grandma, unless she is into political intrigue. Not for children over 14, mostly because they won’t be able to catch, and understand, all the nuances of the plot. A good date movie if you like to debate topical subjects.

Posted by hansonk@optonline.net at 15:31:03
Comments

3 Responses to “Syriana’s Message is Solid, but”

  1. clinty says:

    Must say you have diverse taste in films - be interested to know how you have become such an ”expert”, why you choose the films you review and who/what you are ??? (not that it matters) You give a good critique, not over sentimental, but thoughtful and quite original (please dont tell me you ”borrow” your comments from anybody else !!). Must be disappointing you do not get more comments from bloggers - you deserve more feedback !!

    regards Clinty x
    ps have you seen Wolf Creek ? What did you think ?

  2. author says:

    Thanks for comments. I do have diverse taste in films — but as to Wolf Creek, I must (sheepishly) admit that I don”t see much in the thriller/horror genre. The last one I did in the category (pre-blog) was the Ring and I am still getting over it.

    No fear: I don”t borrow my comments from anyone else — these babies are all mine.

    btw, do we know each other? how did you find this blog?

    kim

  3. marcia says:

    Right on. I didn”t know whether the problem was directing or editing. I think both. Good acting, but probably only film seen in a long time where everyone is a bad guy except finally George in the end.

Leave a Reply